Back to blog
YouTube & Creator Growth3 min read

How I Automate 80% of My YouTube Workflow

The exact automation stack I use to go from idea to published video in half the time. Includes my Make.com scenarios, AI prompts, and project templates.

How I Automate My Youtube Workflow

When I started on YouTube, every video took 20+ hours from idea to publish. Now it takes about 8. The difference isn't that I got faster at editing. It's that I stopped doing things manually that a machine can handle.

Here's the exact system.

The Workflow, Step by Step#

Every video I publish goes through the same 7-step pipeline:

  1. Idea capture: Notion database, tagged by category
  2. Research: Perplexity + Claude for competitive analysis
  3. Scripting: Claude with my custom prompt template
  4. Recording: Teleprompter app with the cleaned script
  5. Editing: Mahmoud (my editor) gets the raw footage + script
  6. SEO optimization: Title, description, tags, thumbnail brief
  7. Publishing: Upload, schedule, distribute to socials

Steps 2, 3, 6, and 7 are almost entirely automated.

The Research Phase#

I used to spend 2-3 hours researching each video topic. Now I spend about 20 minutes reviewing what the AI found.

My process:

  • Feed the topic into Perplexity to get the latest data and sources
  • Drop those sources into Claude with a research synthesis prompt
  • Claude outputs a structured brief: key points, statistics, common misconceptions, and angles competitors haven't covered

The brief goes straight into my Notion project page for that video.

Scripting with AI#

I don't let AI write my scripts. I let it draft them, then I rewrite.

The difference matters. My voice, my stories, my opinions: those can't be automated. But the structure, transitions, and initial phrasing? AI gets me 70% there in 10 minutes instead of 2 hours.

Prompt structure I use:
- Topic + angle
- Target audience
- 3 key points to hit
- Tone: conversational, direct, no fluff
- Length: [X] minutes at 160 words/minute

SEO on Autopilot#

After the video is recorded, I run my SEO workflow that tripled my short-form views:

  • Title generation (5 options, scored by CTR potential)
  • Description with keywords in the first 150 characters
  • Tag string optimized for search + suggested
  • Thumbnail brief for Ahmed (my thumbnail designer)

This used to take 45 minutes per video. Now it takes 5.

The Publishing Pipeline#

Once a video is uploaded to YouTube:

  1. Make.com detects the new upload
  2. Pulls the title, description, and thumbnail
  3. Creates a blog post draft on my website
  4. Generates social media captions for Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram
  5. Schedules the social posts for optimal times

I review and approve everything before it goes live, but the drafts are ready within minutes of uploading.

What I Still Do Manually#

  • Recording (obviously)
  • Final script review and personal stories
  • Thumbnail approval
  • Community engagement and comments
  • Strategic decisions about what to make next

These are the high-value activities. Everything else is a system.

The ROI#

Here's the math:

  • Before automation: 20 hours per video, 2 videos per week = 40 hours
  • After automation: 8 hours per video, 2 videos per week = 16 hours
  • Time saved: 24 hours per week
  • Cost of tools: ~$150/month
  • Value of saved time: Incalculable (but it's a lot)

The point isn't to remove yourself from the creative process. It's to remove yourself from the parts that don't need you. I break down the full framework for deciding what to automate in a separate post.

ML
Moe Lueker

Moe shares tool walkthroughs and lessons from real projects. Mechanical engineer, then venture capital, now building AI tools for creators and small businesses. More about Moe

youtubeautomationmake.comcreator workflow